Removed TODO comment in ResourceOffers(...), that wasn't necessary anymore.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fae3a35403
commit
89a294b365
1 changed files with 0 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -234,7 +234,6 @@ func (s *ProactiveClusterwideCapFCFS) stopRecapping() {
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
// TODO: Need to reduce the time complexity: looping over offers twice (Possible to do it just once?).
|
|
||||||
func (s *ProactiveClusterwideCapFCFS) ResourceOffers(driver sched.SchedulerDriver, offers []*mesos.Offer) {
|
func (s *ProactiveClusterwideCapFCFS) ResourceOffers(driver sched.SchedulerDriver, offers []*mesos.Offer) {
|
||||||
log.Printf("Received %d resource offers", len(offers))
|
log.Printf("Received %d resource offers", len(offers))
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -272,8 +271,6 @@ func (s *ProactiveClusterwideCapFCFS) ResourceOffers(driver sched.SchedulerDrive
|
||||||
3. fcfsCurrentCapValue is updated with the determined cluster wide cap.
|
3. fcfsCurrentCapValue is updated with the determined cluster wide cap.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Cluster wide capping is currently performed at regular intervals of time.
|
Cluster wide capping is currently performed at regular intervals of time.
|
||||||
TODO: We can choose to cap the cluster only if the clusterwide cap varies more than the current clusterwide cap.
|
|
||||||
Although this sounds like a better approach, it only works when the resource requirements of neighbouring tasks are similar.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
taken := false
|
taken := false
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in a new issue